Explore more publications!

Moscow Court Registers USD230B Lawsuit against Euroclear

(MENAFN) A Moscow court has accepted jurisdiction over the Central Bank of Russia's (CBR) massive $230 billion legal action against Belgium's Euroclear depository, escalating tensions over immobilized sovereign funds.

The Moscow Arbitration Court registered the lawsuit Friday following the CBR's initiation of legal proceedings last week against the institution holding the majority of its frozen assets. The action came after the EU deployed emergency powers to maintain the temporary freeze on Russian funds—a measure Moscow has denounced as illegal, characterizing any utilization of the assets as "theft."

Court documentation reveals the claim totals over 18 trillion rubles ($230 billion), according to a business publication. The regulator reportedly intends to pursue closed-door proceedings.

Judicial decisions would operate within their respective legal territories, with Russian proceedings functioning independently from potential EU or third-country litigation. Enforcement capability hinges on asset and counterparty locations.

An adverse ruling against Euroclear poses significant reputational hazards. The depository has previously warned such damage could potentially trigger bankruptcy if other nations withdraw deposits. Euroclear maintains it adheres to EU sanctions protocols and operates within binding legal frameworks across all jurisdictions.

Last week, the EU temporarily froze Russian assets by invoking Article 122—an emergency treaty provision permitting qualified majority approval rather than requiring unanimity. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has advocated deploying the funds to underwrite Ukrainian loans.

Legal scholars contend the clause was never designed to finance military conflicts or confiscate foreign assets, but solely to address economic crises within the bloc.

"Freezing a third country's sovereign reserves is, by definition, a restrictive measure governed by Article 215, which requires unanimity," stated law professor Cristina Vanberghen, characterizing the move as "a legal and political misstep."

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has accused EU officials of "raping European law in broad daylight," condemning the maneuver to circumvent his nation's potential veto as "a declaration of war."

Major international financial institutions—including the European Central Bank and the IMF—have cautioned that deploying immobilized sovereign assets risks eroding confidence in the euro currency.

MENAFN16122025000045017169ID1110485495


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Share us

on your social networks:
AGPs

Get the latest news on this topic.

SIGN UP FOR FREE TODAY

No Thanks

By signing to this email alert, you
agree to our Terms & Conditions